To meet rising demands and to combat the fact that 75% of employers report difficulty filling open roles—agencies are taking proactive steps to make their outcomes and overall hiring processes better with AI recruiters.
To meet rising demands and to combat the fact that 75% of employers report difficulty filling open roles—agencies are taking proactive steps to make their outcomes and overall hiring processes better with AI recruiters.
In any case, hiring is one of the biggest challenges staffing and recruiting agencies face everyday. We’re living in an exciting time though, and it’s crazy how much the digitization of recruitment processes have made the entry for new agencies easier.
To give a little background on our topic for today—smaller sized and new teams generally have trouble with limited resources or tight budgets, while larger agencies might deal more with huge volumes of applications and competition for talent. What they’re now doing to meet these demands and to combat the fact that 75% of employers report difficulty filling open roles—agencies are taking proactive steps to make their outcomes and overall hiring processes better with AI recruiters.
These tools have become accessible to pretty much everyone, whether you’ve explored them before or don’t even consider yourself or your team “tech savvy”. Our interactions on these platforms are upgraded constantly by the people delicately crafting them, just for us to have the most seamless of experiences. It’s simple, they give us the tools, and we use them if they work. And they do, because it’s no question that leaders are taking advantage of AI voice agents to streamline recruiting and scale outreach, and if you’re a lean or new team—why can’t you?
More importantly, what do they have access to or don’t? Of course, the way an agency hires depends heavily on everything it has access to and its size.
Most of the time, challenges are in getting that much needed visibility for smaller agencies. Are candidates going to apply to jobs small recruiting agencies offer as their first option? Probably not. Teams that are limited in head count and resources really have to hustle to manage all their running tasks. They just don't have the network like a Ranstad might. Their brand recognition, and outreach capabilities make it harder to keep up with each one of their client needs and expectations. What slows them down even more are outdated and traditional recruiting methods.
You can imagine how it can easily become a very time consuming, and less effective process for smaller agencies when generating revenue from placements without any sort of automation. Adding to their client list, making placements and everything in between is way more critical for them in order to sustain their business and stay in the game.
Consider Maria's boutique tech recruitment firm in Austin. Three team members, with zero brand recognition. They’re competing against:
On the other hand, larger agencies deal with an entirely different kind of pressure.
The amount of applications they receive alone creates delays. On top of that, they’re competing with other big players, startups, and even remote-first companies for the same pool of skilled folk. It’s very common for larger organizations to face challenges in maintaining consistent hiring practices throughout different departments.
Take Global Talent Solutions. 500 employees, and a good global presence. Their problems look a lot different:
No organization is immune to the challenges of hiring the best talent.
Sometimes, these agency owners want to just be able to set it and forget it—to prioritize higher value tasks that can’t afford to get delayed any further. Smarter tools do that through processes like automated interviews, giving candidates equal opportunities to shine, and recruiters that time back to take a deep breath and channel that effort where they might need it most.
Of course, larger teams are also managing interviews across different clients, roles, and responsibilities within departments. With AI in hiring, teams get consistency in their processes even as the organization scales.
Even if you’re working with five candidates or hundreds, systems like these make it easier to spot who is actually qualified for a role. They help you grasp the most important details, compare candidates in your talent pool effectively—for you to move quickly on the best choices for your open roles.
AI voice interviews have all the benefits of virtual interviews, but they take it just a step further. You can get:
Whether you’re hiring for one client or sixty,
HeyMilo’s AI-powered virtual interview platform built for staffing agencies lets you:
Adaptive AI tools for recruiting like HeyMilo are built to make recruitment smarter and more efficient for agencies of all sizes.
Yes, when it comes to interviews, we utilize an active proctoring layer, an AI-classifier, and more to detect cheating. We provide a trust score that indicates the likelihood of cheating.
Candidates are appreciating the ability to go beyond their resume and interview in a more interactive/adaptive manner compared to one way video interview software. We also have an average candidate satisfaction score of 4.6/5 - which highlights HeyMilo's conversational AI.
Questions can be configured with an objective evaluation criteria - so candidates are evaluated the way your recruiting team currently evaluates candidates.We additionally run 3rd party bias audit checks so with HeyMilo, you're leveraging ethical AI.