A practical comparison of iCIMS AI and HeyMilo across sourcing, engagement, contextual resume screening, form screening, conversational interviewing, scheduling, events or onboarding, integrations, compliance and enterprise scale.

A practical comparison of iCIMS AI and HeyMilo across sourcing, engagement, contextual resume screening, form screening, conversational interviewing, scheduling, events or onboarding, integrations, compliance and enterprise scale.
All hiring processes are different, especially in staffing. Both the iCIMS AI and HeyMilo optimize outcomes but they optimize for different aspects of the funnel. Here is a simple way to look at the core flow of each from a staffing perspective: sourcing → engagement → screening/interviews → scheduling → events/onboarding → reporting/integrations.


Both are enterprise-ready and speed hiring but they work for different support points.
Explore an iCIMS alternative that is staffing-native with sourcing, configurable engagement, contextual resume screening, form screening, two-way conversational interviewing and ATS sync in one flow.
Yes, when it comes to interviews, we utilize an active proctoring layer, an AI-classifier, and more to detect cheating. We provide a trust score that indicates the likelihood of cheating.
Candidates are appreciating the ability to go beyond their resume and interview in a more interactive/adaptive manner compared to one way video interview software. We also have an average candidate satisfaction score of 4.6/5 - which highlights HeyMilo's conversational AI.
Questions can be configured with an objective evaluation criteria - so candidates are evaluated the way your recruiting team currently evaluates candidates.We additionally run 3rd party bias audit checks so with HeyMilo, you're leveraging ethical AI.